Gun control debate is one of the few debates that have been going on for several decades. It is not as if the issue is so complicated that no solution can be found. All that is needed is an open mind to pause the gun control debate for a while and look at the gun crime statistics and do an honest introspection. Anyone doing this exercise will definitely come out in favor of gun control. Unfortunately, the gun control debate is carried on by way of gun control articles in the print media and discussions and debates in the electronic media. It is time that we put a stop to drafting a new gun control essay every minute. The only sensible thing to do is to consider gun control facts and evaluate them without any bias. I am listing out some facts about gun death that will startle anyone with a humanitarian outlook. 1) Firearms (meaning guns) are used to kill people in about 60 percent of the crimes classified as homicides. This shows that guns are the most preferred weapon of killers. With so many potential killers prowling around, we should do something to prevent them from killing people using the guns they possess or get hold of from others who possess. 2) If the fact that guns are the most commonly used in weapon in homicides disturbs you, how will you feel to know that the story is the same with suicides as well? Stronger gun control laws can help prevent not only murders but also suicides. No gun control debate can obscure this reality. 3) Gun death statistics show that countries that have fewer people owning guns, have fewer incidents of murders. Won’t you like our country to be one among these? 4) Gun death can also cause damage to the economy. It has been estimated that the United States suffers an economic loss of $3.7 billion per year because of gun crime. Any gun control debate should consider the economic aspects of gun control as well. With gun crime facts showing a clear rod map towards a stronger gun control regime, the impediment for effective action comes from a few legislators owing allegiance to the National Rifles Association (NRA) who are able to draft rules that will prevent the efforts of CDC even from collecting statistics about gun death related issues. With this being the reality, can there be a meaningful gun control debate?
The issue of Gun control cannot be a point of endless discussions and debates anymore. Gun crime statistics reveal an alarming trend. The correlation between gun ownership and gun death is becoming stronger by the day. It is high time that the endless comparison of gun control pros and cons is put to an end and some concrete action is taken by way of making gun control more effective. Any gun control essay only makes the gun control debate sharper with more and more arguments being put up in favor of both the sides of the issue. Effective gun control needs action not a plethora of gun control articles dwelling on oft repeated arguments. Just look at the figures for gun death. It is 30,000 per year for our country, not a figure that can be considered small by any yardstick. With gun control facts showing that there are 89 guns for a population of 100 in the United States, we can understand and appreciate the imperative need for making gun control real by tightening the screws on gun ownership laws. The main opposition to gun control legislation comes from the National Rifles Association (NRA) which has a fairly large membership and a strong political clout. But the reality is that NRA is not a club in the traditional sense of the word, though it is called an association. It is a lobby, a high paid lobby at that with the sole aim of frustrating all efforts towards making gun control laws tighter. NRA is not an association of sportsmen, as it is sought to be projected. Whatever description the Association may use about it, it cannot alter the fact that the NRA is only a highly paid lobby of people stubbornly opposed to any kind of control on gun ownership. There is another issue relating to the gun crime statistics which is not known to many. Do you know that gun deaths affect our economy also? The annual figure for the loss stands very high at $3.7 billion year. So implementing strong gun control measures apart from curbing gun crime can help our economy as well!
Gun death statistics project a grisly picture of the effect of uncontrolled gun ownership. But gun crime statistics seem to have no impact on the anti gun control lobby. Take for example the American Rifles Association (NRA) who seems to be leading the attack on the protagonists of stronger gun control. The activities of NRA on the anti gun control front make one wonder whether it is an association of sportsmen as claimed by its members or it is a highly paid lobby as alleged by its critics. Countering all the claims made by the NRA, the gun death statistics show that gun ownership has a strong positive correlation with gun crime. Otherwise, how will one explain the fact that the number of murders in any country has a direct variation with the number of privately owned guns in that country? Gun death statistics also go to show that the ratio of gun ownership is very high in America with 89 guns for a population of 100. If we combine both these findings based on gun control facts, we can easily conclude that it is the uncontrolled gun ownership in our country that contributes to its high rate of gun death. One more startling fact revealed by gun death statistics is that the number of suicides in an area is also related to the number of guns owned in the area. The message conveyed by these figures is very simple. If you have more guns, you are likely to have more murders or suicides! But none of these gun death statistics will matter to the NRA which has been adopting an intransigent attitude towards gun control, who is unwilling to consider the gun control pros and cons. The NRA goes all out to prevent any meaningful anti gun legislation being enacted by threatening the legislators that they would be defeated even in the primaries if they fail to toe the line of the NRA. It is not surprising therefore, to see several legislators joining the anti gun control lobby unmindful of the disturbing outlook presented by the gun death statistics.
This website is dedicated to the right to bear arms. I know many Americans feel they need a gun to be safe. We want to discuss this viewpoint directly and find out how realistic that really is. The 2nd amendment gives Americans the right to bear arms. But it is also illegal to drive 100 miles per hour or yell FIRE in a theater. So where it the balance when it comes to Gun Control?