The Bill of Rights is what people call the first ten amendments to the Constitution. These were each added in so that people could make sure that they would be able to enjoy the natural rights of property and liberty. One of the most hotly contested of these is the 2nd Amendment, which most people interpret as giving people the right to bear arms. In addition to the right to bear arms, the 2nd Amendment also makes mention about a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of the state. This is one of the many reasons why the 2nd Amendment still today remains under close scrutiny. Many proponents of gun control believe that the 2nd Amendment was intended to give the military the ability to work with weapons, and that ordinary citizens should not be able to legally possess them. The often point out gun control statistics, many of which do not yet include some of the more recent mass killings that have taken place in public areas and schools over the last few years. For other people, the 2nd Amendment is one of the most basic and sacred freedoms, second only to the 1st Amendment to the constitution, which guaranteed people freedom of speech, worship and the press. They see the right to bear arms as a way to ensure that people will always be able to protect themselves, whether it is from the kind of tyrannical government that the Founding Fathers feared, or from a criminal element within society. Those that are against the 2nd Amendment believe it to be one of the primary reasons for gun violence today. Obviously, advocates of the 2nd Amendment believe it to be all that is standing between honest people and oppression. These two opposing viewpoints have each recently become more and more vocal, even though at the end of the day, both are hoping to see an end to senseless violence and random killings.
Is there a connection between gun control facts and gun control laws? Yes, there is. Gun control facts show us how good and how effective the existing gun control laws are. They can also indicate the course of action to be pursued if we are concerned about gun death. Gun death statistics are one form of gun control facts listing facts in the form of figures, ratios and percentages. They show us the relationship between gun ownership and gun crime. Another kind of gun control facts is information comprising news stories. Taken together, these two kinds of data will present the gun control pros and cons, thus enabling us to think for ourselves and decide what we should do to make the gun control laws more effective. Gun control facts comprise not only facts and figures but also arguments. One of the arguments the anti gun law groups often come out with is that in a democracy, gun control laws have no place. This argument ignores the fact that the purpose of gun control laws is not to prevent guns but to prevent tyranny and lawlessness that may result from uncontrolled gun ownership. Realizing that this kind of argument will sound too weak in any gun control debate, these people invoke the sanctity of the 2nd amendment that guarantees gun owning rights. An appropriate response to this will be to point out that considering that people involved in formulating 99 percent of this act had no formal legal education, there can be nothing sacrosanct about this law. Gun control facts should also contend with the activities of the anti gun control lobby, notably the National Rifles Association (NRA). This highly paid lobby, which calls itself as an association of sportsmen, is well known for its abrasive ways of threatening some legislators that they should toe the line pursued by the NRA lest they should face a defeat in the primaries.
A very large number of gun control articles have appeared in the print media over the period of the past 40 years ever since the assassination of President Kennedy, an event that triggered an intensive gun control debate throughout the country. Not that the issue was not debated before. Perhaps, the debate started even when the gun was invented! But gun control articles started appearing in a big way only in the last few decades. With the problem of gun death assuming alarming proportions as indicated by gun crime statistics, there has been a proliferation of gun control articles as well. Gun control articles are expected to present the gun control pros and cons in detail to help the readers make an informed decision on the issue of gun control. For example, there is a finding based on gun crime statistics that children are in a position to take possession of the guns belonging to their parents in 39 percent of the households since they know the places where the guns are kept by their parents! Another finding that can be revealed is that the number of murders is less in those countries which have a smaller number of guns. When such a startling fact is highlighted by gun control articles, readers will be awakened to the risks involved in owning guns. Apart from discussing gun control facts, gun control articles can also help in clearing some misconceptions created by the anti gun control lobby. For example, one of the arguments advanced by this group is that the right to possess guns is sanctioned by the 2nd amendment and hence this right should not be taken away by any law. A well researched article will inform the readers that almost the entire 2nd amendment, 99 percent of it to be precise, was written by people who had not undergone any legal education. These people did not even have any college education. Bringing these facts to light will make the readers understand that the argument put in by the anti gun law groups has no substance. Gun control articles can also highlight the fact that the National Rifles Association, the NRA as it is widely known, is not willing to accept any compromise on the issue of gun control. When such obstinacy is highlighted, the readers will know how reasonable the anti gun control advocates are.
The topic of gun control invariably raises a lot of controversy. There is a powerful section in the United States that has been fiercely resisting gun control and has been doing everything it could, to stymie any gun control legislation being enacted by the Congress. Let us quickly identify four strong factors to support the cause of controlling gun ownership. 1) The US has a disproportionately larger share of the guns in world. Well, guns are not resources to be considered an asset. Therefore, the shocking information provided by gun control facts that the US has 50 percent of the total number of private guns in the world while its population constitutes just 5 percent of the population is definitely a point in favor of stronger gun control laws. 2) The second factor is provided by gun crime statistics. A study has found that, of all the homicide crimes committed in our country, guns take a lion’s share of 60 percent . With such a strong evidence on the way guns are used, the argument that gun ownership is needed for self protection falls by the wayside. 3) US is one of the largest democratic countries in the world. Therefore, we have the responsibility to protect democracy. Democracy should prevent tyranny and if guns promote tyranny, then gun control is an essential remedy to curb this tyranny. 4) Any move towards gun control is resisted by certain groups, notably the National Rifles Association, popularly known as the NRA. Ironically, the very opposition of gun control by this group strengthens the case for bringing in some form of control in buying and using guns. It is well known that NRA is not really an association of sports people as being made out, but only a highly paid lobby. This lobby stubbornly opposes any control over guns ignoring all gun death statistics without even caring to go through the gun control pros and cons. It even forces some legislators into submission by threatening them that they would lose their primaries if they decide to support gun control legislation, convinced by the gun crime statistics.
Gun control debate is one of the few debates that have been going on for several decades. It is not as if the issue is so complicated that no solution can be found. All that is needed is an open mind to pause the gun control debate for a while and look at the gun crime statistics and do an honest introspection. Anyone doing this exercise will definitely come out in favor of gun control. Unfortunately, the gun control debate is carried on by way of gun control articles in the print media and discussions and debates in the electronic media. It is time that we put a stop to drafting a new gun control essay every minute. The only sensible thing to do is to consider gun control facts and evaluate them without any bias. I am listing out some facts about gun death that will startle anyone with a humanitarian outlook. 1) Firearms (meaning guns) are used to kill people in about 60 percent of the crimes classified as homicides. This shows that guns are the most preferred weapon of killers. With so many potential killers prowling around, we should do something to prevent them from killing people using the guns they possess or get hold of from others who possess. 2) If the fact that guns are the most commonly used in weapon in homicides disturbs you, how will you feel to know that the story is the same with suicides as well? Stronger gun control laws can help prevent not only murders but also suicides. No gun control debate can obscure this reality. 3) Gun death statistics show that countries that have fewer people owning guns, have fewer incidents of murders. Won’t you like our country to be one among these? 4) Gun death can also cause damage to the economy. It has been estimated that the United States suffers an economic loss of $3.7 billion per year because of gun crime. Any gun control debate should consider the economic aspects of gun control as well. With gun crime facts showing a clear rod map towards a stronger gun control regime, the impediment for effective action comes from a few legislators owing allegiance to the National Rifles Association (NRA) who are able to draft rules that will prevent the efforts of CDC even from collecting statistics about gun death related issues. With this being the reality, can there be a meaningful gun control debate?
The issue of Gun control cannot be a point of endless discussions and debates anymore. Gun crime statistics reveal an alarming trend. The correlation between gun ownership and gun death is becoming stronger by the day. It is high time that the endless comparison of gun control pros and cons is put to an end and some concrete action is taken by way of making gun control more effective. Any gun control essay only makes the gun control debate sharper with more and more arguments being put up in favor of both the sides of the issue. Effective gun control needs action not a plethora of gun control articles dwelling on oft repeated arguments. Just look at the figures for gun death. It is 30,000 per year for our country, not a figure that can be considered small by any yardstick. With gun control facts showing that there are 89 guns for a population of 100 in the United States, we can understand and appreciate the imperative need for making gun control real by tightening the screws on gun ownership laws. The main opposition to gun control legislation comes from the National Rifles Association (NRA) which has a fairly large membership and a strong political clout. But the reality is that NRA is not a club in the traditional sense of the word, though it is called an association. It is a lobby, a high paid lobby at that with the sole aim of frustrating all efforts towards making gun control laws tighter. NRA is not an association of sportsmen, as it is sought to be projected. Whatever description the Association may use about it, it cannot alter the fact that the NRA is only a highly paid lobby of people stubbornly opposed to any kind of control on gun ownership. There is another issue relating to the gun crime statistics which is not known to many. Do you know that gun deaths affect our economy also? The annual figure for the loss stands very high at $3.7 billion year. So implementing strong gun control measures apart from curbing gun crime can help our economy as well!
Gun death statistics project a grisly picture of the effect of uncontrolled gun ownership. But gun crime statistics seem to have no impact on the anti gun control lobby. Take for example the American Rifles Association (NRA) who seems to be leading the attack on the protagonists of stronger gun control. The activities of NRA on the anti gun control front make one wonder whether it is an association of sportsmen as claimed by its members or it is a highly paid lobby as alleged by its critics. Countering all the claims made by the NRA, the gun death statistics show that gun ownership has a strong positive correlation with gun crime. Otherwise, how will one explain the fact that the number of murders in any country has a direct variation with the number of privately owned guns in that country? Gun death statistics also go to show that the ratio of gun ownership is very high in America with 89 guns for a population of 100. If we combine both these findings based on gun control facts, we can easily conclude that it is the uncontrolled gun ownership in our country that contributes to its high rate of gun death. One more startling fact revealed by gun death statistics is that the number of suicides in an area is also related to the number of guns owned in the area. The message conveyed by these figures is very simple. If you have more guns, you are likely to have more murders or suicides! But none of these gun death statistics will matter to the NRA which has been adopting an intransigent attitude towards gun control, who is unwilling to consider the gun control pros and cons. The NRA goes all out to prevent any meaningful anti gun legislation being enacted by threatening the legislators that they would be defeated even in the primaries if they fail to toe the line of the NRA. It is not surprising therefore, to see several legislators joining the anti gun control lobby unmindful of the disturbing outlook presented by the gun death statistics.
This website is dedicated to the right to bear arms. I know many Americans feel they need a gun to be safe. We want to discuss this viewpoint directly and find out how realistic that really is. The 2nd amendment gives Americans the right to bear arms. But it is also illegal to drive 100 miles per hour or yell FIRE in a theater. So where it the balance when it comes to Gun Control?