You’ll hardly find much in the 2nd amendment, the right to bear arms debate on this subject; certainly none of the NRA sponsored websites and their paid hacks writing for them and the opinion pages of newspapers. There is a technology that could help the police and FBI immeasurably to track down the source, hence the buyer, of explosives or simple gun powder: micro particles called taggants. “IDENTIFICATION taggants are microscopically color coded particles that, if added to explosives or gun powders during their manufacturing, might facilitate tracing those products after a bombing back to the manufacturer. Then, through use of mandatory distribution records, tracing would continue through wholesaler and dealer levels to an original purchaser or point of theft. Detection taggants may be added to a product to facilitate detection of that product before it is exploded or burned in a crime.” (NRA) This sounds like a good, useful technology right? It doesn’t hurt anybody, is harmless to the product and certainly doesn’t seem like it could be very expensive. Doesn’t impact the 2nd amendment. Helps the good guys and doesn’t hurt anyone: So what did the NRA do? The strangled the plan. The NRA lobbying company has so much power in congress that despite this total upside to taggants they killed the legislation is service to their clients…gun powder makers. From the same website: “Section 732 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 required a general study of taggants as directed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The study is required to demonstrate that taggants: “will not pose a risk to human life and safety; will substantially assist law enforcement officers in their investigative efforts; will not substantially impair the quality of the explosive materials for their intended lawful use; will not have a substantially adverse effect on the environment; and the costs associated with the addition of the tracers will not out weigh benefits of their inclusion.” During the summer of 1996, Congress approved an NRA backed proposal (an amendment to Section 732 in H.R. 3610, the Omnibus Consolidation Appropriations Act of 1997) that an independent body examine all technologies that allow explosives to be detected before a terrorist or criminal explodes his bomb in addition to those that will identify the explosive after a blast. NRA fought hard for the inclusion of this language, knowing that preventive technologies offer our best hope for enhanced public safety and more effective law enforcement.” Who would have thought that the NRA represented gun powder manufacturers?! You don’t see that in the typical 2nd amendment article! The NRA is the lobbying force for all associated weapons makers and sellers. They have nothing whatsoever to do with sportsmen. While our opinion pages are clogged with empty 2nd amendment articles constantly trying to play sleight of hand with issues such as the 2nd amendment and the bogus “right to bear arms” the real battle for citizen safety is being murdered by the NRA. What is gun control? In the US gun control is fighting the NRA! TAGS: 2nd amendment; gun control debate; gun control statistics; what is gun control.
At last, the gun control debate is beginning to gain some traction. For a very long time it seemed all gun control articles were only about the 2nd amendment and “the right to bear arms.” Now however, the tide is changing. More and more articles are revealing the gun control statistics, and these are making people wake up. In 2010 there were almost as many deaths by gun as death from traffic accident. That is shocking. Not enough articles reenforce these gun control statistics. However, focusing too much on deaths diminishes the real significance. For every one person killed by a gun THREE are wounded. If there are thirty thousand deaths there are on hundred thousand injuries! Three times as many wounded as killed. There is a good gun control statistic for people to remember. The real reason we need gun protection laws, aka gun control, is because Americans can’t be trusted with guns. Gun violence is not about drug dealers shooting one another, it is about drunk angry men shooting their wives or girl friends. Gun protection laws are about slowing domestic violence. Gun control is about protecting women. What is gun control about? This; guns do only one thing. They kill. That is their sole purpose. We make students go to drivers education for hours and hours and hours because we want our roads to be safe FOR ALL OF US. We need to do the same thing about guns. Many people who own guns have them for the worst reasons. They live in a safe neighborhood and claim they need a gun for “protection.” That’s like wearing a football helmet for fear of bird poop. It makes no sense. This isn’t said much in gun control articles but the real reason men want guns is because it converts their sense of self from powerless to powerful. Most guys slog through life with little or no control over much. A gun in the hand gives them the power of life and death. Think of any other thing that does that. Tags: gun control statistics, gun debate, US gun control statistics
The 2nd amendment reads, ” A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” It is considered by scholars to be part of a group of statements termed the “militia clauses” because the need for, organization and uses of militias are described in various places in the constitution. In revolutionary times militias were the principle means of organizing a military defense on any scale from local to national. There was no army for the nation. Militias were created and managed by states. As a means of local, regional and national defense militias were an important part of government. Beginning in the early part of the 20th century militias were replaced first by National Guard units. While still managed by individual states the federal government exerted ultimate control over them. A governor could call up the guard for emergencies and the president could call all of them up for a national emergency or war. The decade of the 1960’s was a bloody one. JFK and Martin Luther King were assassinated. The counter culture was evolving and great antipathy was arising toward the Viet Nam war. The first serious calls for gun control began. In response, beginning in the 1970’s, the arms industry in America began to research sentiment among gun owners. They conducted simple market and consumer research just as a soap or cereal company would do. They discovered that there was a strong sentiment of “individuality” among gun fans. This was primarily a regional blend of Southern anti government resentment, STILL lingering from the Civil War, and an almost childlike, fairytale attachment to the cowboy myth. Men, overtly defensive about their guns suffered from a type of rational and intellectual cognitive bias. They thought all the John Wayne, John Ford, Tom Mix, Roy Rodgers portrayals of American history were true. Like little girls who grow up believing in the Prince Charming myth, gun collectors believed in the Cowboy myth. Of course, any rational evaluation of these childish sentiments turns the argument into laughable mush but in America belief systems are manufactured by industry. Our entire economy is based on the freedom of advertisers to create myths and persuade consumers to associate themselves with them. “Good moms use Tide!”; Busy dads show their children love by sharing Frosted Flakes with them; College educated women still need magic enzymes in their guts that only Activa can provide. America is built upon marketing myths. It is the fuel that drives our economic engine. The weapons industry, through the NRA, has found a way to legitimize a disreputable fantasy and convert it into a patriotic, macho American myth for men. We have to change the story. We have to spread the word: guns are not patriotic, men solve problems with their minds not with guns; people who believe that guns solve problems have a treatable mental disorder and, finally, Americans don’t need guns at all. We are safe here. TAG: gun control article, gun control statistics, gun control article, 2nd amendment, gun control article, the right to bear arms, cowboy myth, gun control article, gun control, patriotism, gun control article. Second amendment, gun control article, freedoms, gun control article, constitution, gun control article.
What is gun control all about? Too often gun control articles are driven by an irrational argument. The gun control articles that dominate newspapers, magazines and public debate almost always revolve around the 2nd amendment. However, the right to bear arms is essentially irrelevant. Why is it? Two reasons 1) The right to own guns is established and 2) the right to regulate guns is equally well established. In other words, let’s not debate what is already decided. If that’s true than why are so many gun control articles only about the 2nd amendment? The answer is that the gun control debate is still controlled by the gun lobby. This lobby, as we all know, is fronted by the NRA. It is the NRA that has defined the boundaries of the debate and will not permit the discussion to wander toward real issues. By making the debate about nothing, it avoids being meaningful. Maybe “the right to bear arms” is just sleight of hand. What is really important in the gun control debate? To start, they should address statistics. The gun control statistic that is most surprising to many Americans is the number of deaths caused by guns compared to the number caused by traffic accident. They are almost equal! In 2010, the last year for data, there were 33,687 traffic deaths and 31,672 gun deaths (CDC.) Here are other important gun control statistics: there are an estimated 300 million guns in America, not including those owned by the military. How many does the military own? About 4 million. There are 75 times more guns owned by private citizens than the army, navy, marines, coast guard, air force and Special Forces combined. The right to bear arms? That’s covered. So where do we begin a meaningful gun control debate? Maybe we begin by asking “What are we afraid of that we need all those guns?” After that we might ask, “How did we come to feel such fear in ‘The Greatest Country in the World?'” If we are strong, why are we so frightened? So we are left with this “What is gun control really about?” Is it about the right to bear arms? Is it about facts? What is gun control if not a genuine debate about our contemporary culture? What is gun control except a profound, national self inspection? Don’t be fooled by the right to bear arms. That’s not the issue.
Recently, in a small suburban town a woman was returning home from the Post Office pushing her two year old in a stroller. As she passed a stand of trees a 17 year old and a 14 year old stepped out and demanded money. She refused, pleading that she had none. She told them that caring for a baby took all her money. The 17 year old drew a gun and shot at her four times. He grazed her ear and hit her in the lag. He then walked around to the front of the stroller and killed the child, shooting it in the face. These murderers were caught and will be prosecuted. Were these assassins operating under the 2nd amendment? Despite the terrifying gun control statistics in America most gun control articles are still dominated by gun supporters who complain relentlessly, and falsely, about “the right to bear arms” allegedly protected by the 2nd amendment. Where in the 2nd amendment is the call for compassion? Where among the fanatic’s gun control articles is the rational recognition that America’s gun culture is actually a culture that condones murder? Gun control articles are dominated by supporters of the NRA. But this denies the fact that gun control statistics demonstrate a shocking, heartless society. The number of negative gun control statistics far outweigh the alleged importance of the 2nd amendment. Yet the debate is dominated by gun fanatics. The NRA is now recognized for what is so obviously is, the lobbying arm of American gun makers. The gun makers have no sympathy. Gun makers have no compassion. Gun makers desire profits and it doesn’t matter who is killed in the process. When American’s learned that the makers of cigarettes had known for decades that their product killed people they didn’t say, Cigarettes don’t kill people; People kill themselves.” They didn’t because they knew how stupid it was. Yet those who defend murder by gun are not held accountable. Cigarette makers were prosecuted; the gun lobby had a law passed making them immune from prosecution! We have the facts, the gun control statistics, to right matters. What is gun control even about? Right now the gun control debate is dominated by a sideshow, an irrelevant argument about the 2nd amendment that evades the point. Gun control statistics are astonishing. By 1964 more Americans were killed by guns in America than ALL the combat deaths in all the wars the country has ever been in. Almost FIFTY YEARS AGO! Let’s make the debate relevant!
Gun fanatics, who dominate the gun control debate, complain loudly about the Right to Bear Arms and their privileges under the 2nd amendment but there is a significant opposing viewpoint held by many Americans: Gun laws are not strong enough. Gun control statistics support the contention that guns are a major public health issue in America. Deaths caused by guns are nearly equal to those by car accident. In 2010, the last year for data, there were 33,687 traffic deaths and 31,672 gun deaths (CDC.) This is a serious problem. Some claim that the new laws (SAFE) passed in New York State are the nation’s toughest. SAFE is a weak effort to address it. Beyond banning evil military weapons and requiring background checks the legislature could have done much more. They should have spiked the tax on guns and ammunition. This tactic was successful reducing another public health issue, smoking. Gun taxes should equal forty or fifty per cent of the sale price. This money could then be used for a buyback program to remove guns from circulation. SAFE should have required that every gun and shell be “micro stamped.” This technology identifies individual weapons and stamps that gun’s ID onto every shell. Arnold Schwarzenegger made this the law in California in 2007! Additionally, every bullet and shell can also be made identifiable…with existing technology. Gun control statistics show that this is of enormous help to police. Gun control statistics suggest that SAFE should have broadened the exclusions of people who cannot own a gun. These would include people convicted of multiple DWIs, those who were charged with violent felonies but plea bargained down to a lesser misdemeanor. Gun control statistics support the idea that chronic lawbreakers, with any history of drug or alcohol abuse, should be barred from getting a gun. SAFE should have required mandatory safety inspections for any home with children and or more than one gun. These inspections could be carried out by local building inspectors and a nominal inspection fee paid by the gun owner. The purpose of such inspections would be to ensure that the weapons are properly locked up. Gun control statistics show that there are almost 20,000 gun inflicted suicides in America annually demands this regulation. We stand today where America stood the day after 9.11, we are vulnerable and confronted by a dangerous, well organized enemy: the NRA. They control the gun control debate. The overwhelming majority of Americans want an end to gun violence. To reach that goal we must act with intelligence and courage. We can defeat this scourge if we have the fortitude to act.
The question whether we need gun control laws at all is sometimes posed by people who are opposed to making the present gun control laws tighter. These people argue that the concept of gun control will be an anomaly in a democracy. If we accept this logic, we cannot have any law at all in a democracy because all laws seek to impose some kind of control on the people. Such a situation will only lead to anarchy. Democracy has the responsibility to prevent anarchy. The objective of gun control laws is not to prevent people from owning guns but to prevent anarchy. Placing reasonable restrictions on gun ownership cannot be considered an infringement on the freedom of people. Anyone who looks at gun control facts will understand the need for making the task of gun control more effective by making the laws tighter. Everyday, we come across gun death statistics in the newspapers which make us feel disturbed. If we make an honest effort to weigh the gun control pros and cons, we can only conclude that gun control is the need of the hour. Gun crime statistics show that the United States has a proportionately higher number of guns. The fact that the United States which contributes only to 5 percent of the population of the world has about 50 percent of the privately owned guns of the world is enough to settle the gun control debate in favor of stronger gun control. The information that countries that have fewer guns also have fewer murders and other severe crimes adds strength to the case for gun control. People who are in favor of unrestricted gun ownership but are against any kind of control on gun ownership use the right given by the 2nd amendment to own and bear guns as a point in their favor. What they fail to see is that 99 percent of this law was created based on the inputs received from people with no college education. A right based on such a weak foundation cannot be considered absolute. Unfortunately, opponents of gun control are resorting to unethical means to further their cause. For example, some legislators who are loyal to the NRA (National Rifles Association) are found to be creating rules that will have the effect of preventing organizations like the CDC even from studying gun violence. these people are not willing to accept gun control.
Those opposed to effective gun control always seem to dominate the discussion. The internet, TV interview programs, gun control articles and opinion pages look as if the majority of Americans are rabid about “gun rights” or “the right to bear arms.” This is a false impression. Over two thirds of American households have no guns. The overwhelming majority of us doesn’t like or don’t care about guns. Only one in ten women owns a gun. The angry rhetoric about the 2nd amendment is irrelevant to most Americans. Equally significant is that most guns in America are owned by a tiny minority. About 6.4 percent of the population owns 65 percent of the guns! If only 6 percent of the population are fanatical gun collectors then why is our national dialogue dominated by their angry, persecuted opinions in one gun control article after the next? The answer is the NRA. The NRA is not a sportsman’s association. It is the lobbying arm of gun and ammunition manufacturers. Despite claims to independence, the NRA’s financial support overwhelmingly comes from gum makers not gun owners. With an annual budget in excess of $300 million and only about 4.1 million members paying $25 a year it is easy to see who the NRA serves. In 2010 they received $71.1 million in donations. In 2012, the biggest NRA donor was Midway Corp an ammunition producer and maker of high capacity magazines. The founded the “Round UP” program where gun buyers round up their purchases to the next dollar the difference going to the NRA. At least 50 other companies in the gun industry have joined the program. They sponsor of the pro gun control articles across America. The NRA proclaims that its mission is to defend the 2nd amendment. However, its efforts have consistently focused on legislation that benefit weapons makers. According to a recent gun control article, in 2005, it lobbied to pass a law that gave gun manufacturers and distributors immunity from lawsuits from victims of gun violence. Cities, such as New Orleans, had also filed suits seeking damages for health care costs and other expenses resulting from gun violence. The NRA also speaks against the sentiments of its own membership. In a recent gun control article, Republican pollster Frank Luntz sited gun control statistics showing that very few members agree with the organization’s stances on gun control. According to Luntz’s survey 82 percent of all gun owners, and 74 percent of NRA members, support requiring criminal background checks for gun purchasers. The NRA does not. The NRA is transparently the voice of weapons makers and has dominated the public’s perception of the issues regarding gun control. It is time for the majority of Americans to stand up against the NRA message. Learn the facts and advocate for safety not violence.
Most people may be surprised to learn that gun control has been around in some form or another for nearly a century. Since first being installed in places like New York City decades ago, gun control has evolved to take on many different forms. Despite the wide variety of gun control statistics, people still cannot seem to agree on what level is acceptable. Finding an appropriate level of control for firearms that saves lives, but does not infringe on the 2nd Amendment is tricky. Some people believe that any time a new measure of gun control is instituted, it is a blatant attempt to take away the right to bear arms. Those on the other side of the fence try and argue that here in the 21st century, it is nearly impossible to know what the Founding Fathers meant when they included the 2nd Amendment into the bill of rights. When two groups approach each other from such opposite sizes of the spectrum, it sometimes may feel as if it is impossible to find common ground. Gun control has tended to vary from state to state. While some states like Illinois and New York have incredibly tough laws on the books, they still are plagued by gang violence and murders within their inner cities. Other states, such as Texas and Florida, have looser laws, and enjoy a slightly lower crime rate. Gun control is typically one of those subjects that is so touchy it even scares most lifelong politicians. No one wants to be seen as the person who allows crime to continue, and no one wants to be perceived as the one person who wants to infringe on one of the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution. All things considered, practical and effective gun control measures will probably not come to pass until both sides are able to compromise.
In almost all pro weapon gun control articles you will find reference to the 2nd amendment expression, “The right to bear arms.” In the majority of gun control articles the rational for this right is related to the idea of having guns to fight the government. It is rare to find a gun control article that takes a different view. This one does. While gun fanatics might want to take up arms against a properly elected democratic government doing so would be an act of treason. Therefore the notion that the right to bear arms means the right to violently rebel is an obvious problem. If the 2nd amendment allows violence against the government then the 2nd amendment is approving and protecting treason. The” right to bear arms” does not give any protection to acts of treason. But let’s examine this idea a little more. Most gun control articles carefully avoid any legitimate gun control statistics. Some will offer false or distorted information but few will face the harsh realities of factual gun control statistics. For example few if any pro gun articles will feature the facts that over 2200 gun deaths, in the US alone, since the massacre at Newtown. Most anti gun control articles will avoid the hard fact that far more women than men are murdered by guns in America. No, most gun articles are little more than an outraged whine about losing imaginary freedoms. The 2nd amendment argument in particular ia annoying because of some other TRUTHFUL gun control statistics. Here is the most important one: While the true number of guns in America is unknown (largely due to the efforts of the gun lobby in Washington), what we can access is terrifying. How’s this to justify the idea that the right to bear arms is under attack or that the government is “coming to take your guns:” by the best assessments available there are… 37 MILLION guns in private hands in America. Ok, so what? Well, the entire US military only has… 4 MILLION guns! That’s right. There are 9.25 private weapons for every one held y the military! The right to bear arms? The 2nd amendment? The government coming to “take away your guns?” Who is really crazy here?