The question whether we need gun control laws at all is sometimes posed by people who are opposed to making the present gun control laws tighter. These people argue that the concept of gun control will be an anomaly in a democracy. If we accept this logic, we cannot have any law at all in a democracy because all laws seek to impose some kind of control on the people. Such a situation will only lead to anarchy. Democracy has the responsibility to prevent anarchy. The objective of gun control laws is not to prevent people from owning guns but to prevent anarchy. Placing reasonable restrictions on gun ownership cannot be considered an infringement on the freedom of people. Anyone who looks at gun control facts will understand the need for making the task of gun control more effective by making the laws tighter. Everyday, we come across gun death statistics in the newspapers which make us feel disturbed. If we make an honest effort to weigh the gun control pros and cons, we can only conclude that gun control is the need of the hour. Gun crime statistics show that the United States has a proportionately higher number of guns. The fact that the United States which contributes only to 5 percent of the population of the world has about 50 percent of the privately owned guns of the world is enough to settle the gun control debate in favor of stronger gun control. The information that countries that have fewer guns also have fewer murders and other severe crimes adds strength to the case for gun control. People who are in favor of unrestricted gun ownership but are against any kind of control on gun ownership use the right given by the 2nd amendment to own and bear guns as a point in their favor. What they fail to see is that 99 percent of this law was created based on the inputs received from people with no college education. A right based on such a weak foundation cannot be considered absolute. Unfortunately, opponents of gun control are resorting to unethical means to further their cause. For example, some legislators who are loyal to the NRA (National Rifles Association) are found to be creating rules that will have the effect of preventing organizations like the CDC even from studying gun violence. these people are not willing to accept gun control.
Gun death statistics do not lie because these are figures compiled by government and non government agencies including the United Nations Organization. So, we can rely on gun death statistics to understand the reality of the situation arising out of unrestricted gun control. People who are against gun control have been using an argument that owning guns will make life more secure for people. But gun death statistics have exploded this myth. Gun control facts indicate that in the United states, there are about 90 guns for every 100 people. This high gun ratio is what is advocated by the anti gun control groups as an insurance against crime. But has it given security to the people? Gun death statistics show that in areas that have a large number of guns, a much larger number of children and women get killed by guns. Gun crime statistics, by thus showing that the reality is opposite of what was projected by the gun control lobby, have exploded the myth that gun ownership gives more protection to people. Gun death statistics also show how the reach of gun crime has affected the country’s economy as well. As a result of gun deaths, the US economy suffers an annual loss of about 4 billion dollars. Whenever facts supporting a particular argument are revealed in a debate, we will normally expect the other side to respond by refuting them or otherwise dealing with them appropriately. But this does not happen with gun control debate. The pro gun groups have nothing to say about gun crime statistics. So, they raise sentimental issues like protecting the right of gun ownership given by the 2nd amendment. The fact that about 99 percent of the second amendment was written on the basis of inputs given by people with no college education and hence no legal education does not appeal to them. People who oppose gun control legislation routinely treat gun death statistics casually, since the scenario presented by these figures cannot be comfortable to them. The anti gun control movement is led by the NRA (National Rifles Association) which functions more like a lobby than like a political organization. Some legislators supporting the NRA are making rules which will be impractical to follow and stymie the efforts of organizations like the CDC involved in studying gun violence. Perhaps, they expect that compiling more gun death statistics will be prevented.
Can gun control articles play any role in bringing about a strong gun control regime? Yes, they can. The written word has a power of its own. Gun control articles are doing a great service to the cause of controlling gun ownership in two ways. Firstly, these articles discuss the issue in great detail by using gun control facts and put the issues involved in proper light. Secondly and more importantly, gun control articles help in mobilizing public opinion in favor of the right side by making people aware of the facts. Since many people do not have the time, knowledge or inclination to study the issues involved in gun control and make up their minds, they depend on gun control articles published in the newspapers, periodicals and the internet. Gun control articles thus enlarge both the scope of and the level of participation in the gun control debate. They do it both by bringing gun crime statistics to the knowledge of their readers and making the readers understand the picture presented by these statistics. Without gun control articles making the issues clear to them, most of the readers may have only a superficial understanding of the subject. Let us see how gun control articles present some of the facts relating to gun control. People who oppose gun control laws claim that allowing people to have guns will help prevent crime. Gun control articles present evidence to disprove this claim. Studies have found that if there is a gun in a house, the women and children living in that house have a greater risk of falling prey to gun violence. Another finding is that states that have high gun ownership have a higher number of children becoming victims of homicide. A third fact that corroborates these two data is that the number of gun deaths for 100,000 citizens is higher for the United States than it is for South Africa, resulting in the US getting ranked below South Africa in controlling gun crimes. The one group that seems to have ignored all these facts presented by gun control articles is the National Rifles Association (NRA), which is leading the fight against gun control. By following a policy of not compromising on its stand, the NRA has reduced itself from the status of being a club to that of a highly paid lobby.
When we read a gun control article, we may wonder whether such an article serves any purpose. We all know that gun control is a contentious issue. The gun control debate has been going on for long, with the issue still remaining unsettled. How relevant is a gun control article in this scenario? I think that the relevance of the gun control article arises from the fact that we still need to mobilize public opinion in favor of stricter gun control laws. The opponents of gun control are well organized. They are able to mobilize political power in their favor. Take for example the leading anti gun control organization, the NRA (National Rifles Association.) This organization stubbornly refuses to participate in a meaningful gun control debate and openly follows a policy of not accepting any compromise on this issue. It therefore becomes necessary to mobilize people in support of gun control by bringing gun crime statistics to light. This job is being done by the gun control article. The best way to present the gun control facts to the people at large is through the media. Though everyday the newspapers carry gun death statistics, a vast majority of people are apt to ignore them. But people spend time to read newspaper articles including the gun control article to understand issues clearly. The gun control article should first counter the argument made by the pro gun lobby that having more guns is the way to prevent crime, by revealing the fact that there is no evidence to support this assumption. Gun crime statistics,in fact, show the reality to be the opposite. Even if the gun control article brings to light a few facts like the ones listed below, it will be doing a great service to the cause of arresting gun crime. 1) About 30,000 deaths are reported every year as resulting from guns. 2) About 40 percent of the children living in the houses that have guns are well aware where they can find the guns in their houses. The danger potential of the children getting guns into their hands can be easily understood by anyone. 3)In the states and regions which have a large gun owning population, a larger number of children become victims of gun violence than in those regions with a smaller gun owning population. A gun control article highlighting the above issues will be highly relevant to the issue of gun control.
Compiling gun death statistics will have value only if we are able to use them to gain a better understanding of the gun crime scene. Many a gun control article has been written packed with gun crime statistics. But if people look at statistics only as numbers and do not make an effort to understand the picture presented by them, gun death statistics will be of little value to us. For example, what will a person reading a fact that there are 30,000 deaths in the United States every year understand about gun crime? He may not even be able to judge whether this figure is normal or abnormal. One may even think that this figure is not high considering the population of the country. It is the duty of gun control articles to present this fact in perspective by expressing this as a percentage of guns owned by the US citizens and making a comparison with other countries. Such a comparison will show that countries that have a smaller number of guns have a smaller number of murders. Such a presentation will make people understand the gun death statistics in an appropriate way. Since gun death statistics unequivocally support a case for stricter gun control laws, opponents of gun control are doing their best to stop the gun control facts from coming out. We all know that the National Rifles Association (NRA) has been stiffly opposing gun control laws. It has been threatening the legislators that it will work for their defeat in the primaries if they fail to extend their support to the NRA. Apparently propelled by these threats, some of the legislators have taken sides with the NRA and have been putting obstacles in the process of collection of gun death statistics. They create rules that will make it difficult for the National Institute of Health to even study gun violence. Having no answers to the facts revealed by gun death statistics, the NRA and its supporters have been relying on the 2nd amendment to defend their right to own guns. But the fact that about 99 percent of this law was based on the information written by people with no legal education makes their argument sound weak. The picture presented by gun death statistics is real and cannot be ignored.
The issue of Gun control cannot be a point of endless discussions and debates anymore. Gun crime statistics reveal an alarming trend. The correlation between gun ownership and gun death is becoming stronger by the day. It is high time that the endless comparison of gun control pros and cons is put to an end and some concrete action is taken by way of making gun control more effective. Any gun control essay only makes the gun control debate sharper with more and more arguments being put up in favor of both the sides of the issue. Effective gun control needs action not a plethora of gun control articles dwelling on oft repeated arguments. Just look at the figures for gun death. It is 30,000 per year for our country, not a figure that can be considered small by any yardstick. With gun control facts showing that there are 89 guns for a population of 100 in the United States, we can understand and appreciate the imperative need for making gun control real by tightening the screws on gun ownership laws. The main opposition to gun control legislation comes from the National Rifles Association (NRA) which has a fairly large membership and a strong political clout. But the reality is that NRA is not a club in the traditional sense of the word, though it is called an association. It is a lobby, a high paid lobby at that with the sole aim of frustrating all efforts towards making gun control laws tighter. NRA is not an association of sportsmen, as it is sought to be projected. Whatever description the Association may use about it, it cannot alter the fact that the NRA is only a highly paid lobby of people stubbornly opposed to any kind of control on gun ownership. There is another issue relating to the gun crime statistics which is not known to many. Do you know that gun deaths affect our economy also? The annual figure for the loss stands very high at $3.7 billion year. So implementing strong gun control measures apart from curbing gun crime can help our economy as well!
This website is dedicated to the right to bear arms. I know many Americans feel they need a gun to be safe. We want to discuss this viewpoint directly and find out how realistic that really is. The 2nd amendment gives Americans the right to bear arms. But it is also illegal to drive 100 miles per hour or yell FIRE in a theater. So where it the balance when it comes to Gun Control?