Archive for May, 2013
2nd Amendment There are not very many hot button issues that stir up controversy more than gun control and the 2nd Amendment. While there are usually two sides to every opinion, this issue has many sides. Gun control has increasingly been in the spotlight with the recent shootings in Aurora, Colorado, and Sandy Hook, Connecticut. Even Barack Obama and his presidency have created controversy. We have seen supplies of guns and ammunition dry up, as gun proponents buy up the stock. They believe that the government will soon try to take away all guns and weapons. This is a rather knee jerk reaction. The 2nd Amendment actually provides protection and the right to bear arms. It is extremely unlike that the current government will try to collect all the guns legally owned by American citizens. While one side wants the free transfer and ownership of any type of gun, assault weapons included, the opposing side wants a more controlled gun ownership plan. One law that was bandied about and was subsequently voted down, was to require background checks of potential gun owners. Proponents of this procedure used the mental illness issues that have surfaced regarding both the Aurora and Sandy Hook shooters. Gun enthusiasts and gun opponents use both gun control statistics and the 2nd Amendment to advance their message. One side claims the 2nd Amendment ensures that anyone can own any gun at anytime. The other side claims that it was actually written to protect the right to self protection against the military, or to defend the country. Both sides have good points concerning the 2nd Amendment and gun control. It will probably be a long and perhaps endless debate. If you are on the fence, there are plenty of discussions on the Internet that can provide opinions and insights.
If you read many of the gun control statistics that are out there, they sure do paint a picture about guns being dangerous and hazardous to society. Some people are very adamant about the right to bear arms and feel that no matter what they should be allowed to own a gun. These people do not believe that the gun control statistics are a direct reflection of the weapon itself, but rather an indication of what people who need rehabilitation or help of some sort can and will do with a gun. This is why the issue of gun control can get so heated among people who believe that doing away with guns is not the answer to fixing the problems that we currently have with guns killing people and destroying other things as well. The 2nd amendment gives us the right to bear arms and to defend ourselves with a gun whenever we feel threatened or in danger. This is where the gun control statistics can get a little fuzzy. For some people that are facing the gun control statistics for the first time, they may have to look closer to see and recognize that they are painting a picture of people using guns but not at the cause or effect of a fatality due to the usage of guns. For these reasons, we find that the gun control statistics are somewhat skewed and cannot tell us for certain whether a gun is a good or bad thing. For reasons such as these we find that by getting ourselves more educated about guns, and making the learning of a gun part of required study before one can apply for a license, makes it even more paramount as well as limits the number of people that can in fact have a gun. Therefore, the people that have these guns tend to be more responsible with them.
The 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution gives every adult American the right to bear arms. The interpretation of this right has been challenged again and again through the centuries, as more modern technologies have paved the way for a different way of living than what was happening in the late 1700s. However, some still hold firm to the belief that everyone should have the right to own guns, while others stand firm in their own beliefs that there should be restrictions on the ownership of these guns. This gun control debate rages on hotly in Congress, in schools and in households throughout the country. When anyone talks about gun control, they usually have quite a firm opinion on this subject. Lots of hunters, gun enthusiasts, public officers and those holding to strict Constitutional beliefs tend to skew toward the idea that gun control is not a very good idea. They often feel as if they are being watched too closely by the government, and they argue pretty well that their rights are firmly embedded in the U.S. Constitution and that they cannot be broken or infringed upon by any outsider. These people often point to gun control as a very unnecessary part of life, and they would rather have the freedom to buy and sell guns as they see fit without the government stepping in to control things. On the other side of this gun control debate is people who are advocating for stronger and stricter laws. These laws that these people are proposing are not specifically intended to keep these gun owners away from their guns, but rather they are wholly intended to keep guns out of the hands of people who should not be owning a gun. These advocates argue that anybody can buy a gun at a gun shop and that this should not be the case. There should be stronger controls like background checks and other things that help prevent these guns from ending up in the wrong hands. Often, these advocates point to sometimes alarming gun control statistics, which sometimes help their arguments and sometimes do nothing at all. This debate will rage on as long as nothing is done about it in Congress. Even after that point, people still will feel slighted regardless of the end they are on in the gun control debate. Hopefully one day it will all be resolved, but until then people will voice their opinions on this.
You’ll hardly find much in the 2nd amendment, the right to bear arms debate on this subject; certainly none of the NRA sponsored websites and their paid hacks writing for them and the opinion pages of newspapers. There is a technology that could help the police and FBI immeasurably to track down the source, hence the buyer, of explosives or simple gun powder: micro particles called taggants. “IDENTIFICATION taggants are microscopically color coded particles that, if added to explosives or gun powders during their manufacturing, might facilitate tracing those products after a bombing back to the manufacturer. Then, through use of mandatory distribution records, tracing would continue through wholesaler and dealer levels to an original purchaser or point of theft. Detection taggants may be added to a product to facilitate detection of that product before it is exploded or burned in a crime.” (NRA) This sounds like a good, useful technology right? It doesn’t hurt anybody, is harmless to the product and certainly doesn’t seem like it could be very expensive. Doesn’t impact the 2nd amendment. Helps the good guys and doesn’t hurt anyone: So what did the NRA do? The strangled the plan. The NRA lobbying company has so much power in congress that despite this total upside to taggants they killed the legislation is service to their clients…gun powder makers. From the same website: “Section 732 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 required a general study of taggants as directed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The study is required to demonstrate that taggants: “will not pose a risk to human life and safety; will substantially assist law enforcement officers in their investigative efforts; will not substantially impair the quality of the explosive materials for their intended lawful use; will not have a substantially adverse effect on the environment; and the costs associated with the addition of the tracers will not out weigh benefits of their inclusion.” During the summer of 1996, Congress approved an NRA backed proposal (an amendment to Section 732 in H.R. 3610, the Omnibus Consolidation Appropriations Act of 1997) that an independent body examine all technologies that allow explosives to be detected before a terrorist or criminal explodes his bomb in addition to those that will identify the explosive after a blast. NRA fought hard for the inclusion of this language, knowing that preventive technologies offer our best hope for enhanced public safety and more effective law enforcement.” Who would have thought that the NRA represented gun powder manufacturers?! You don’t see that in the typical 2nd amendment article! The NRA is the lobbying force for all associated weapons makers and sellers. They have nothing whatsoever to do with sportsmen. While our opinion pages are clogged with empty 2nd amendment articles constantly trying to play sleight of hand with issues such as the 2nd amendment and the bogus “right to bear arms” the real battle for citizen safety is being murdered by the NRA. What is gun control? In the US gun control is fighting the NRA! TAGS: 2nd amendment; gun control debate; gun control statistics; what is gun control.